Sarah
Cervantes-Pahm1, Alejandro Buentello2, and John
Schillinger3
1Director of Feed Marketing – South East Asia,
Schillinger Genetics, Inc.
2VP of Research and Aquaculture Business,
Schillinger Genetics, Inc.
3President, Schillinger Genetics, Inc., West
Des Moines, IA, USA
Soybeans or soybean meals (SBM), are the major source of protein
in livestock diets. Despite the presence of anti-nutritional factors (i.e.,
trypsin inhibitors [TI] and oligosaccharides) that limit their potential
inclusion levels in diets for monogastric animals, soybeans or SBM are one of
the best plant protein sources for animal feeds. The removal of
anti-nutritional factors in soy products is usually achieved using various
processing techniques. However, reducing the concentration of TI and
oligosaccharides can also be attained by selective breeding. Recently,
Schillinger Genetics has successfully produced novel soybean varieties
(Navita™) that contain TI and oligosaccharides at significantly reduced
concentrations as compared to those present in conventional soybeans or SBM.
Low TI SBM. Unique soybean cultivars have been developed that contain 65-90%
less TI than conventional soybeans. We hypothesize that heat deactivation may
not be necessary for these particular varieties of soybean. At the University
of Georgia (unpublished data, Batal, 2011), SBM obtained from low and ultra-low
TI soybean varieties were cold-pressed, and meals were fed to broiler chickens.
The concentration of TI in the low-TI (16,000 TIU/g) and the ultra-low TI SBM
(5,000 TIU/g) was less than the concentration of TI in cold-pressed
conventional soybeans (46,000 TIU), but was greater than in
conventionally-treated SBM (de-hulled, solvent extracted, roasted; 3,100 TIU).
True metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen (TMEn) in the low and
ultra-low TI SBM was greater (average 3,749 kcal/kg) than in conventional
soybean (3,612 kcal/kg) and conventional SBM (3,000 kcal/kg). The greater TMEn
of the SBM obtained from low TI and ultra-low TI soybeans was attributed to the
greater concentration of lipids in these
meals (7.8-14.1%) compared with the 1.9% lipid concentration in conventional
SBM. This indicates that less supplemental oil is needed when cold pressed low
TI or ultra-low TI SBM replaces conventional SBM in diets for broilers.
Similar
results were obtained in a swine experiment conducted at the University of
Illinois, Urbana (unpublished data, Stein et al., 2011). Metabolizable energy
of cold pressed low and ultra-low TI soybean (average 4,369 kcal/kg) was also
greater than in conventional SBM (4,006 kcal/kg). Standardized ileal amino acid
digestibility of Lys, Met, Thr, and Trp in cold pressed low and ultra-low TI
soybeans did not differ from their heat processed counterparts, indicating that
heat processing of low and ultra-low TI soybeans was not necessary for optimal
AA digestibility of these novel soybeans.
Low oligosaccharide SBM. Soybean
meal obtained from low oligosaccharide soybean varieties contained 91% less
oligosaccharides (stachyose and raffinose) than conventional SBM. In a recent
experiment conducted at Auburn University (unpublished data, Dozier et al.,
2010), SBM derived from low-oligosaccharide and high crude protein (CP) soybean
varieties were incorporated in diets and fed to broiler chickens. Apparent
metabolizable energy values corrected for nitrogen (AMEn) were 7% higher for
birds fed low-oligosaccharide-high CP SBM (53% CP and 1.7 % oligosaccharide;
AMEn 2,360 kcal/kg) compared with birds fed conventional SBM (46.6% CP and 7.3%
oligosaccharide; AMEn 2,190 kcal/kg). Growth studies conducted with these same
meals indicated that 13 day-old chicks fed the low oligosaccharide-high-CP SBM
attained an 18 g advantage in body weight compared with birds fed conventional
SBM (381 g versus 363 g). Feed conversion ratio and body weight at 40 days were
not different between birds fed the low-oligosaccharide-high-CP SBM and
conventional SBM, but 17% less SBM was required in low-oligosaccharide-high-CP
diets to meet the chicken’s CP and amino acid requirement.
From
a practical perspective, the value added advantage in using these novel soybean
varieties is highlighted by savings in processing costs (no need for
heat-deactivation of protease inhibitors), absence of nutrient deterioration
associated with heating, and the elimination of detrimental effects of oligosaccharides
in novel soybean varieties developed at Schillinger Genetics.
Hello Ms.Pahm, nice to know that you will present a paper. Wow, how i wish I could attend the conference. See you again!
ReplyDeleteKaye (UPLB)